Showing posts with label winston churchill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label winston churchill. Show all posts

Monday 17 April 2023

Coincidence Theory









During lockdown I noticed that the less educated a person, the easier they understood a concept I conveyed to them. The educated are too clever and materialist to engage with information and pattern recognition that is an existential threat to how they wish to be perceived in the wider world.

What I asked people was, did you notice in the middle of the propaganda guff about masks and taping up benches in parks and urinals in restrooms, that it was SIX people at a gathering, SIX feet social distancing (subsequently rounded up 18cms to 2 metres) and if one died from the flu statistics that disappeared during the pandemic, they would be buried SIX feet under?

For the memory-wipes and the too-busy-types, may I remind you of Churchill's most precious quote?

"“Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."

Orwell also weighed in on the subject.

Sunday 4 December 2022

Alexander on Churchill



Boris corroborates historian David Irving's evidence on Churchill and the 'Focus Group' who turned Churchill against Germany in order to pay Churchill's cigar and champagne bills (and Chartwell). It's illegal to explain this so I'm only pointing out the speech above and Irving's documentation on the subject.

Also, we can now make sense of why Churchill was such a massive antisemite before WW2. I'm using the language of today as the sons of Shem have nothing to do with the white land thieving, genociding scum in Palestine.

Money makes the world go round or flat if you wish. That's how superficial people are on Qatar or 1/4 million dead British troops in WWII.

I now believe after deeper research that Churchill had a surprisingly sensitive soul and was a victim of agendas beyond his control, I know how tough decisions can be to take and also how they can explode into the public domain looking like service to self when in fact it's more a question of survival. 

Churchill's parents are the give-away. 

When I read about the letters and the constant yearning for affection and love it's so close to the multiple and multi-generation TBMC information it's not funny and I dare say Boris is a copy to some extent. I guess I'd better add the MKULTRA information as a tag/label to this post.

It's the fiat currency and fractional reserve beast system of money that drives these genocidal decisions. The Bible (and Quran) warns us of the money lenders that Jesus overturned the tables against and tried to kick out of the temple.

How do we know it's real? 

Because they changed the name from Money Lenders to Money Changers.

They're sensitive to the subject as it were.

Monday 21 November 2022

Winston Churchill Research





I think it was Tom who mentioned the speech impediment, and that is born out in this TV 1950 re-election piece, of and by Winston Churchill, as it were

The follow up Ottawa 'Piece' is preposterous. Look at the Grand Poobah behind him, sitting in a propitiously large seat (Bless). And bless your little legs as well.

If we meet in real life, and should you be a Winnie expert. 

Ask me about the debunking research. 

It's troubling.

Monday 13 September 2021

Multi Ethnic Southampton - Reasons To Be Cheerful (Part II)





I was never a big fan of Southampton growing up. It was just grey after living in Deutschland and it wasn't very friendly either.

After the Wirtschaftwunder (Economic Miracle) of living in Germany, a synthetic creation much as British food-stamps were to last long after the war years..... if you get my drift.

Japan and Germany were hit hardest so it's karmically in the controllers favour to rebuild them quickest, while Great Britain was reduced to years of poverty and decline, for essentially provoking war (for those who have read the focus group papers.)

However, my return to Southampton in 2017 has been a renaissance experience for this port city, that was so gritty growing up in the 80s. It's now one of my favourite places and I feel an ease in this city that I've rarely experienced elsewhere.

That is to say, after much exploring and history research, I know this place and because there have been so many changes, it strikes me somewhat as more of a journey partner than a destination. The much maligned Southampton City Council have done a very competent job of upgrading the city and marina areas.

I talked in the last post (Part I), about the commitment from the City council to electric scooters which is easily the most transformative step a city can make for unleashing the freedom of travelling electrically on widely available racks of scooters, distributed around the city and not just in the centre.

In addition, Southampton has attracted a strong and vibrant ethnic mix of immigrants. I'm lucky where I live. St Mary (please note that's singular and an uncountable noun) is both right on the hotspot of that cultural diversity including a strong Hong Kong contingent, Portuguese, Turkish, Somalian, Romanian and on and on it goes, all equally identifiable by their clothes and appearance and adjacent to some awesome greenery.

I'm slap bang in the middle of one of the most interesting neighbourhoods in the city, but also I'm right next to the public parks, of which Southampton has some of the best in the country. It's probably the most consistently relaxing place I can think of other than living on a tropical beach in Jomtien or a particular pub I used to frequent in Freemantle, which irrespective of how tough a day I'd had was a gravity-free experience entering... through the doors and being transported to an island of relaxation, leaving the outside world behind.

I want to elaborate about ethnic and cultural diversity though. 

I'm very aware of the long term plans for humanity. They are laid out in the winner of the first Charlemagne prize (that Churchill won twice) Count Couldenhove Kalergi. 


The most racist people I know are invariably indoctrinated politically, and who can't wait for a regimented mullato (I love coffee-coloured skin) species (Kalergi's words not mine) with fewer languages, one religion; genderless yet stunning and brave, and also the creation of an insect worker... as adumbrated in Huxley's brave new world; men breast feeding babies, lesbians having to accept male penis and so forth is a reality, not wild histrionics.


... and before you invoke the rainbow. It belongs to everyone, including heterosexuals, the working classes, the upper classes, the pious, uncouth, male or female, Asian or not. The rainbow was bestowed on all of us not a radical and toxically empowered clique who are waay more powerful and rewarded in kind, than most have yet to be "caught-on-to", but some, most certainly will if sentient of change.

You see what makes for attractive racial diversity are the differences not the uniformity of the human genome. When I go to Japan, I don't want to see Chinese people, I want to be able to distinguish between the Asian races (for example) which is not as hard as it seems to people who haven't travelled widely in that neck of the woods. There was a time in Bangkok where we could tell which towns the females (they were always females) came from. Nakhon Si Thammarat to Songkhla, Pitsanulouk to Udon Thani. It's one of the most fun party tricks to play in the red light districts of go go bars and neon.

What the social engineers and multi generational planners want and are now destroying with cancel culture and synthetic racism through BLM is the real diversity of the human story which of course from time to time has been nothing to boast about, particularly when thinking of Empire and the stooges that now endorse the CIA running for Congress, and SIS transgender credentials while ignoring the heinous behaviour they partake in. Email me if you have a strong stomach and the courage of your convictions to contest me. I can't post here. 

Back to beauty and happiness though. Recently I came across a beguiling voice in podcasts that I found magnetic and also interested in some of the ideas I'm engaged with and writing about here. We were the same age (52) and had some crossover in our lives as we both lived in Belsize Park, London back in the day at around the same period, and we also both worked in the media business. I as an advertising prostitute and he as a Channel 4 honcho. I googled his name and discovered that he had died only days ago. The last time that happened to me was when I reading Marlon Brando's biography in Bangkok where I learned that he too had croaked. It's quite a poignant feeling when immersing ourselves in famous lives.

Well Jonathan Myles Lea has passed too, and anyone with an ounce of sense can see that what he fought for was beauty and the aesthetic, instead of the rancid blue haired, septum pierced obesity with tattoos who think anything vagina shaped is art.

They are brainwashed, and they have been given license to run the most powerful institutions in the UK from the Foreign Office to Stonewall and Terrence Higgins Trust. They are women haters and insist any Lesbian who refuses to consider a trans relationship is a TERF, a trans exclusionary radical feminist. Well I tell you something blue haired brigade cheerleaders. You too will have to accept and respect the cock (and tame the cunt) when your time comes. This has been, and always will be about male violence. Don't think a wearing a dress is going changes the insides of misogyny.

Anyway, I've clearly wrapped two posts together. One about truth and beauty, and the other about a world which is a threat to that and no amount of running away from the bad news can change it.

I wouldn't want to live in very big cities in the coming years. The poor will be ransacking the not so poor.

I've got a very good feeling Southampton is going to be in better shape, and that makes me cheerful.

Monday 16 November 2020

Waterloo - 1970




It's another demonstration of airbrushed-history that most UK people have no idea that Napoleon fought and lost against the British, Prussians, Austrians and Russians simultaneously at Waterloo.

It's a bit like most British mistakenly believe that Churchill was the principle reason for victory against the Germans, and have no idea that the Soviets lost over a hundred times more troops getting to Berlin than the quarter of a million we lost unnecessarily due to an ethnic supremacy group (in Czechoslovakia) who were picking up Winston's bills.

Waterloo couldn't be made today, because we're so wealthy that employing so many film extras can't be done. Imagine the task of just feeding 16,000 extras, doing the make-up, costumes, horses, film crews and then shooting and watching dailies and reshoots .... impressive.

Although produced by Dino De Laurentiis, it took Soviet money to make Waterloo a reality and thus was appropriately directed by Sergei Bondarchuk assisted by Orson Welles, who plays a bloody marvellous and morbidly obese Louis XVIII.

The costumes are exceptional in this film, and it's worth watching just for that, the sets, and mind-boggling logistics commanded by a brilliant Rod Steiger as Napoleon, unlike Wellington playing Christopher Plummer (sic), as let's face it they're both interchangeable.

The scene that caught my eye was the Duchess of Richmond's Ball in Brussels, but mainly because I'm uncomfortable with battle scenes of horses falling at galloping speed to cannon and artillery fire.

Wellington and Napoleon were both born in the same year, had nepotistical promotions via their brothers, keenly read the works of Caesar and chose Hannibal as their favourite hero. They also shared two mistresses (at different times you understand) and even ate food prepared from the same personal chef.

If you're like me that's always a wink to synthetic history but there's no need to go there if you're unfamiliar with the subject.

Tuesday 27 June 2017

Bilderberger - Prince Bernhard & The Windsors




In the War of the Windsors book by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince, we learn that founding Bilderberger and SS member, Prince Bernhard (also alleged paedosadist), was the only security risk German not interned during the war.

The key question for me is how the Royals were pro Nazi until it was no longer viable as Churchill was pushing for war due to Chartwell running costs and his cigar, gambling and drinking debts being paid off by the Focus group who were another front for the Zionists... The True Victors of WWII.

Saturday 15 April 2017

Unslaved Podcast: Winston Churchill, The Truth




Witty drunk, Winston Churchill sacrificed a quarter of a million British soldiers to pay off his bills and secure a statue in Westminster.

If Poland was so important to the British that they entered the war for it, then why did they hand it over to the Soviets at the end of the war? The answers to these questions are completely cogent when the subject is studied from the perspective that all the actors were aligned for war including FDR and Stalin.

This discussion with Michael Tsarion is highly informed and hammers home the research I've been unearthing for some years. I welcome this subject securing the air it needs to breath.

Tuesday 17 September 2013

The Ridiculous Cult Of Churchill





I enjoy Churchill's turn of phrase and puckish sense of humour but let's not let personality get in the way of a sober analysis. Let's take a closer look at what he did.

Churchill got us into not out of war

It's easy to forget that the UK declared war on Germany not vice versa. Whoever declares war is usually a good indicator of the warmonger and it's nonsense to say it was over Poland when the Russian's took it in the end.

Churchill was pro Fascism in 1937

Churchill lavished praise on both Adolf Hitler and MussoliniThe best Anglo-American publicist, Francis Neilson, described Churchill's praise of Hitler as the most extreme tribute ever paid by a prominent Englishman to the head of a foreign state.

Churchill was funded by Zionist Bankers

Churchill's about turn on everything he stood for including political parties and ideology was based on money. He was often in debt and in no position to maintain his expensive hereditary house Chartwell with a staff of around forty.

Churchill cost us half a million British lives

If entry into the war wasn't about ideology, wasn't about land, wasn't about external threat from a guy who was originally an anti-semite till the Zionist bankers paid for him to change his mind, then it cost the UK half a million needless lives.

Nobody knows what would have happened if the British let Germany have Poland instead of Soviet Russia who got it in the end, but the cult of Churchill is based on revisionism and mind control programming. 

History belongs to the winners and so I find that too much of history is pure bunk. Check out this great recording on the Focus Group that sponsored Winston Churchill to the tune of Fifty Thousand Pounds. 

That's ten pennies a British life. 

Think of that next time a Churchill wank stirs your loins.

Thursday 16 August 2012

Cold War 03/24 - Marshall Plan 1947 1952



All these years and I didn't actually know that the Marshall Plan was made by a civilian who used to be General Marshall in the military. Great series although a little biased against Joe Stalin's viewpoint of the world. Joe Stalin the United States ally in WWII. Yeah that one.

Tuesday 24 July 2012

Winston Churchill - The Tony Bliar Of His Day




One of the worst political biographies I've read was Lord Jenkin's Churchill. It was tedious to the maximum and totally avoided any colouring in of Winston's personal life. A lobotomy of a biography in other words, but one detail I never forgot. 

On Winston's first contact with the enemy in the Boer war (pictured  above) he threw up his arms and surrendered. This fits in perfectly with the picture portrayed by David Irving in this wonderful (and slightly subdued) lecture on the arsehole with the cigar and the witty one liners.

Maybe Winston was the Groucho Marx of leaders? A cartoonish figure stumbling about pissed while on official duty but always sober when writing his important books that are absent of a personal diary for reference.

Who knows, but in this presentation Irving also goes into the gritty details of FDR's hold over Churchill but not his knowledge that Churchill forged paintings to make money and pay for Chartwell House which was crippling him when he was in political nowhere land. At that time he was also taking back handers from an Anti German group that eventually dragged the UK into a needless war costing a half million British lives. 

In Churchill's favour though FDR had plans to rip the British Empire from the UK and I don't think that would have been a bad idea.

Friday 13 July 2012

Kennedy On Churchill - He's a Warmonger



Britain's finest WWII historian outlines why Winston Churchill is responsible for the deaths of half a million British and millions more abroad. By any metric Winston Churchill should have been on trial in Nuremberg while the real Nazis were being ushered into the United States through Operation Paperclip.

Winston Fucking Churchill





History is a lot more deceptive than we are led to believe. FDR was a much darker character than I ever thought but in both good and bad ways. In fact I get the feeling that nobody has ever nailed quite what FDR was up to if we look at what he was doing and saying in private. It's so inconsistent with the official and authorized biographies that it's clear to me there's a story nobody has yet managed to tell. Did you know for example that FDR was planning war against the British Empire before Pearl Harbour and that British spies were tipping off Japan about FDR's war plans in their direction too? 

Uh huh.. Lots going on with FDR when you factor in the occult dimensions of the Pentagon building he commissioned (before Pearl Harbour) and the Dollar Bill he designed. It's like he knew he was heading into a spiritual war and that innocents were the cost of winning it.

However I'll save that post for another day as I just want to promote this spectacular take down of Winston Churchill who basically dragged the British into an unnecessary war. Hitler was quite happy to withdraw from Poland and Czechoslovakia if he could keep the border bits he wanted and he would have left it at that. But Churchill you see was beholden to a shadowy financier group. Once in power he ditched them too but he was already committed to war with Germany as that is what they paid him to champion. That's half a million British lives sacrificed just so Churchill could have his statue in Parliament square.

Yes he was a brilliant orator and purveyor of witty one liners in much the same way that Tony Blair is a gifted manipulator. However the bottom line is Winston Fucking Churchill was a piss head, a liar and a coward of unimaginable correlation to the mythical figure that history lucked him out on.

Don't believe me though. Listen to the professional historian David Irving. He is our only historian that speaks fluent German and researches from original records not historical publications.

Sunday 25 September 2011

JFK & The Maury Island Incident



Joe Pesci playing the character David Ferrie quotes Winston Churchill in Oliver Stone's JFK. He says nobody will ever solve this case as 'it's a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma'. Until last night I've been reasonably happy that LBJ was coopted by unknown parties to bring together the unholy clusterfuck of the CIA, Mafia, Anti Castro, Military (Industrial Complex) together to pull it off and keep it quiet after. I've posted the evidence for that.

I'm still OK with the LBJ evidence but this morning I listened to two incredible interviews with Red Ice Radio's Henrik Palmgren and the first posted above (now replaced) has pretty much blown open the JFK Coup d'état with a UFO link too bizarre to make up. There's more than just that but it's all so fucking nuts that I'm unable to pull out my ace card explanation because it's so exotic it would shred any credibility I've earned thus far in asking people to take a closer look at issues like 9/11 and say Lunar anomalies I just blogged previously. So I'm going to stay quiet but there is only one explanation that covers the sheer loop the loop insanity of synchronicity that you'll learn in this interview. I love it when it get's this hardcore. Lightweights synchromystics will probably find this too heavy . Below is a picture of Kennedy with the astronaut John Glenn.


Here's the Red Ice Radio Blurb on the interview.

Kenn Thomas is a conspiracy writer, university library archivist, and editor & publisher of Steamshovel Press. Kenn has authored over a dozen books on various conspiracy topics. He's been a key figure in the conspiracy underground for years. His magazine, Steamshovel Press, has deeply influenced the underground conspiracy movement and also surfaced in mainstream popular culture, from The New Yorker to The X-Files. In this first hour, we begin discussing the connection between the JKF assassination and UFOs. Kenn talks about the possibility that Fred Crisman was connected to the assassination of JFK. Crisman's name appears in relation to the Maury Island Incident, an early UFO encounter. The UFO story began with Harold A Dahl who worked for Crisman. Kenn explains the details of this story, the sighting, the JFK connection and the evidence. Later, we discuss the infiltration of the UFO community by government agents and why. We end talking about JFK's last speech, the weaponization of space and underground civilizations. Kenn shares his opinion on aliens and UFOs.

Update: There's another excellent Coast interview on the Maury Island incident over here

Thursday 14 June 2007

Ernest Bevin


I'm reading Alan Bullocks' Ernest Bevin at the moment. It's certainly the most comprehensive biography on Ernie Bevin, but its in some ways a disappointing book. So far I've read one sentence on his marriage and one on his daughter after 300 pages, which is a poor show. We're all a product of the people around us, and I feel that his depth has been stripped by focusing on Bevin's ascent from Trades Union Leader to Minister of Labour, by Churchill's invitation in the coalition government during the second world war. No, its not a great political history book and frankly the British never do quite get it right when trying to paint a picture of our politicians. Its generally either overblown puff pieces or pedestrian led tours of duty-to-detail like the late Roy Jenkins biography on Churchill.

Our cousins in the United States however seem to excel in this department. Maybe its because they have a bigger stage like say in Caro's biographical trilogy of LBJ or for a real left field choice, Edmund Morris' biography on Reagan: 'Dutch'. But for the real master of writing history there probably is no greater insight into power corruption and lies, than by writing your own history, as Kissinger memorably did with his autobiographical trilogy, peaking in the craft of non fiction writing with his second book (for his doctoral dissertation) 'Years of Upheaval' which saw shuttle diplomacy invented, not to mention Vietnam, oil shocks and China to mention a few.

That isn't to say the Bevin biography doesn't shine in parts. In the passage below, we find that he is under pressure in the artificial (for him) habitat as a socialist minister in the house of commons, with criticism all round when the Conservative Churchill steps up and soaks up the punishment in his defence from his own 'side' so to speak.

"To abuse the minister of Labour. He is a working man, a trade union leader. He is taunted with being an unskilled labourer representing an unskilled union. I daresay he gives offence in some quarters; he has his own methods of speech and action. He has a frightful load to carry; he has a job to do which none would envy. He makes mistakes, like I do, though not so many or so serious - he has not got the same opportunities. At any rate he is producing, at this moment, though perhaps on rather expensive terms, a vast and steady volume of faithful effort, the like of which has not been seen before. And if you tell me that the results he produces do not compare with those of totalitarian systems of government and society, I reply by saying 'We shall know more about that when we get to the end of the story'

Time and again Bevin struggles to persuade people that the British worker is motivated most when free to choose their own destiny and less commited when compelled. Only Bevin understood this and fought tooth and nail to gain their permission for anything he subsequently requested from them. This is a logic that totalitarianism never grasps.